Project Manager: Radomír Špok
Timeframe: ongoing (April – September 2011)
Executive Summary:
„Transparency in Lobbying“ was part of an international project of PASOS and took part in several countries in Central and Eastern Europe. EUROPEUM completed the research on main features of the lobbying scene and its regulatory regime within the national context of the Czech Republic. The output is a research paper on lobbying which should include recommendations concerning the Czech Republic. National papers cover the situation in particular countries and represent a very important element in the project. They reveal the main features of the lobbying scene and its regulatory regime within the national context (historical background, defining lobbying, lobbying practice, stated purposes and known reasons for regulating or non-regulating lobbying). They were used as one of the main sources for a broader comparative paper. The project was concluded by an international event organized by PASOS.
The reason of the project is that the think tanks should be prepared to constructively participate in the on-going dialogues and discussions concerning lobbying, having in mind their concern about the transparency of this activities in the first plan, as well as their need to protect perseverance of its mostly not-for-profit form, which is the advocacy for improvement and implementation of laws and corresponding policies as done by think tanks and similar policy analysing institutions or civil society organizations.
Outputs:
Policy papers
Partners:
Center for Public Policy PROVIDUS (Latvia)
Center for Political Studies at the Central European University (Hungary)
The Peace Institute (Slovenia)
European Institute (Bulgaria)
International Centre for Political Studies (Ukraine)
Donors:
Project Manager: Radomír Špok
Timeframe: completed (September 2009 – December 2010)
Executive summary:
The reason for this initiative was the absence of any legal rules governing this area. General public's concept of lobbying or advocacy is often confused with corruption, which is considered a major social problem (eg, CR 18th place out of 27 EU countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index - CPI last year). EUROPEUM believe that the legal framework and the conduct of lobbying is an integral part of the political process and the promotion of group interests in society. The aim of this project is to promote a particular regulation at parliamentary level through public debate, and by many experts in this field.
Outputs:
The outputs of this project were studies about regulation lobbying in different countries.
Donors:
CEE Trust - Trust for Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe
Project Manager: Ivo Šlosarčík
Timeframe: completed (January-September 2009)
Executive Summary:
The goal of the project was to assess the relation between chosen legal instruments adopted in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (Chapter VI of the EU Treaty) and the international legal commitments of the Czech Republic in the field of international criminal cooperation with the focus on the decisions of the European Council and their implementation in relations between member states (with regard to the possible contradiction in the process of implementation of respective international treaties in the given areas, including the issue of modification of these treaties in the sense of the Vienna Convention). The project was written on demand of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic.
Outputs:
Donors:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic
Project Manager: Věra Řiháčková
Timeframe: completed (June 2008 - June 2009)
Executive Summary:
The objective of the project was to come up with suggestions on recreating the concept of intelligence services in the Czech Republic and contribute to the debate by creating a platform for a discussion within a panel of experts. The main goals of the project were as follows: contribute to the open debate on reform of the intelligence services (including the participation of relevant functionaries within experts, public administration, the government and the parliament); ensure and offer a balanced view on various possibilities; influence the political process; open the debate to the civil society, media and general public.
A group of experts worked on a concluding note which was presented at the final seminar in front of the representatives of intelligence services (including the incumbent functionaries) and later made available to the broad audience (interested parties, media). The note was generally considered as useful base for further talks considering the reform of intelligence. The final note was offered by stakeholders of intelligence to the members of the relevant parliamentary committees, the ministry of interior, the officials of the Office of the Government and representatives of the intelligence service and military staff.
Outputs:
Donors:
OSI Think Tank Fund within the Open Society New Response Projects initiative.
Project Manager: Vladimír Bartovic
Timeframe: completed (November 2006)
Executive Summary:
In the framework of the project "Fundamental Rights Agency - views from the new Member States and Germany" have been organized two seminars in the Czech Republic. Both seminars were aimed to discuss the necessity and legal views on the existence of Fundamental Rights agency respectively on the transformation of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia into the above mentioned agency. The seminars were panel discussion where various stakeholders expressed their opinion and were Mr. Przemyslaw Jaron from Centre for International Relations in Poland presented the outcomes of the international research and opinion poll on this topic. Seminars were open to public and they were attended by the stakeholders from state administration, academia and NGOs. Both seminars attracted more than sixty participants.
Partners:
International Institute of Political Science of Masaryk University
This publication contains the proceedings from the conference, organized by EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy in the Senate of the Czech Parliament on 8 October 2004. It contains the interventions of the respective speakers and panelists as well as samples from the discussion.
The publication is available to download here.